November 4, 2025

The University of Wisconsin–Madison has found itself in the eye of a fierce controversy thanks to Associate Dean Percival Matthews. This senior administrator fired off sharp words about President Donald Trump, calling him a racist in a 2018 Facebook post. He didn’t stop there—Matthews also co-wrote a research paper claiming America’s education system, especially mathematics, is "inherently violent" toward Black students, stirring a volcano of reactions. In a January 2018 Facebook message, Matthews criticized Trump harshly: “What’s on my mind? This: When you get a guy in the ultimate seat of power with a history of racist endeavors who makes not-even-veiled racist comments that a decent portion of the people continue to defend, you’re left wondering what’s left to do,” as reported by Fox News. He backed up his points by referring to civil rights leader Malcolm X, saying, “For many, the name Malcolm X evokes the image of an unnecessarily violent man who hated America. But if you actually read the text of his best speeches (I recommend The Ballot or the Bullet as a starter), it’s clear that the frustration was fueled by a bald-faced (look the origin of that term up too) denial of an undeniable and obvious truth.” Matthews was elevated to an April appointment as "special advisor for access and community," a role to help make UW–Madison a welcoming place for everyone, especially students and staff from all backgrounds. But the sparks flew further when Matthews’ academic research, done with Pooja Sidney from the University of Kentucky, argued that Black students face unfair barriers in schools. Their paper highlighted that many Black students who meet standards are denied entry to advanced math classes, while privileged White students sometimes get in despite lower scores. They asked an unsettling question: "How can a Black scholar work to improve a system through rigorous empirical research when that system is arguably inherently violent toward Black children, even the ones who excel at all the tests?" After George Floyd’s tragic death, Matthews continued stirring talks by posting on Facebook, "A legitimate (adv) use of violence can legitimate (vb) use of violence. There are a number of ways to read that sentence." He also mentioned, "And people are surprised that Minneapolis is burning?" Some saw this as explaining anger, others as justifying violence. UW–Madison’s spokesperson, John Lucas, told Fox News, "UW–Madison supports free expression and doesn’t comment on the personal social media accounts of its students, faculty or staff." The University of Kentucky echoed this, defending academic freedom and saying faculty work doesn’t reflect the university’s official stance. This whirlwind brings to light a tough question for colleges everywhere: How far can academic freedom stretch when personal views of top faculty blow up public trust? Critics warn that such bold opinions might deepen political divides or make universities seem biased. Meanwhile, supporters argue that addressing racism—even within subjects like math—is vital and backed by facts. In the end, the battle over Percival Matthews’ words is much bigger than one professor. It shines a spotlight on how U.S. universities juggle free speech, responsibility, and public image amid today’s charged times.

Read More at Timesofindia →

Tags: University Of Wisconsin-Madison, Percival Matthews, Academic freedom, Racism, Mathematics, Higher Education Controversy,