September 14, 2025
The New York Times' puzzle treasure trove just got tastier! NYT Strands, a fresh word game, is winning hearts worldwide, and Sunday’s challenge (#560), themed “Hurry up!”, brought a juicy twist. Unlike Wordle or Connections, Strands serves you a six-by-eight letter grid. Your mission? Find multiple words linked to a theme—this time all about speed and its sneaky opposite.
The theme “Hurry up!” made many expect fast words. But surprise! This puzzle played with opposites. As reported by Beebom, answers like SLOW, POKEY, STEADY, RELAXED, SLUGGISH, and LEISURELY threw a playful curveball. Why rush when you can take it slow?
To help baffled solvers, NYT dropped some juicy hints:
These hints nudged players towards calm and slow vibes—ironic and clever under a “Hurry up!” label!
And now, the star of the show: the Spangram—an important word stretching across the grid. September 14’s Spangram ran horizontally from left to right and started with “NO.” The big reveal? “NOT SO FAST!” Bingo! This phrase tied the whole puzzle’s story nicely.
Rated 2 out of 5 for difficulty, the puzzle was accessible but sneaky. Words like “POKEY” and “SLUGGISH” kept some players scratching their heads. But that’s Strands for you—where steady observation and theme-spotting pay off.
So, what makes Strands shine? It’s a fun blend of creativity and logic. Unlike other word games, it asks you to hunt words in all directions while following a clever theme. Plus, uncovering the Spangram feels like a mini-celebration every day.
The New York Times is riding the wave of word game magic with Strands, adding flavor to its digital puzzle empire. With daily brain snacks, fresh twists, and friendly challenges, Strands keeps puzzlers hooked and returning for more.
In short, Sunday’s “Hurry up!” puzzle was a delightful reminder: sometimes, slowing down is the cleverest move of all! Put on your thinking caps and enjoy the buzz that is NYT Strands.
FAQs:
Tags: Nyt strands, Word puzzles, Spangram, Hurry up theme, Puzzle hints, September 14, 2025,
Comments