September 11, 2025
Mumbai is buzzing with redevelopment activity! Old housing societies—many now over 30 years old—are being torn down to make way for shiny new buildings with fancy amenities. This makeover is super-needed because old buildings can be unsafe and tired. Developers get extra free sale space (called Floor Space Index or FSI) as a reward, which they sell to earn money. But wait, Knight Frank, a top property consultant, just dropped an important warning. While developers are giving big chunks of FSI to societies—sometimes more than 50%—this might cause a headache if things slow down. Gulam Zia from Knight Frank says, "If revenues from free sale cannot cover the stack, the project is unviable." In simpler words, the part developers sell must make enough cash to pay for the whole project. Experts say 30-35% FSI to societies is safer. Since 2020, over 900 societies in Mumbai have agreed to redevelopment, unlocking 327 acres of precious land. By 2030, these projects could create 44,277 new homes worth a whopping Rs 13,000 crore. But these projects take a long time—usually 8 to 10 years to finish. The present optimism comes from strong demand and rising prices, but real estate is like a rollercoaster. It depends on steady economic health, low interest rates, and buyers with enough money. The boom started during the pandemic and is still chugging along, but some signals show sales might flatten soon. Zia warns, "The economics of society redevelopment must be viewed through the lens of sustainability. With overheated market conditions and sharply rising prices, we are at a stage where excessive demand and aggressive offers threaten long-term viability." So, Mumbai’s redevelopment excitement is real and huge, but caution is the name of the game. Builders and home buyers both need to watch closely—will this frenzy keep flowing or hit a bump? Only time will tell!
Read More at Thehindubusinessline →
Tags: Mumbai redevelopment, Fsi allocation, Real estate boom, Housing societies, Knight frank report, Property market risks,
Comments