Amanda Goodall, known as @thejobchick, ignited a fierce debate on social media. She tweeted, “HR is the only department that gets a free pass for being completely useless. They produce zero revenue, kill morale with endless policies, protect the company NOT you, and somehow still get invited to every meeting like they're essential. Remove 90% of HR tomorrow and the business would run smoother, faster, and happier. Change my mind.” The tweet quickly went viral across X, LinkedIn, and Slack. It captured growing frustration with HR after years of layoffs and burnout. Many employees feel HR only supports company interests, especially since HR handles layoffs and strict policies. Critics say HR adds bureaucracy and slows decisions without boosting business revenue. Some admit HR teams grew large during times of easy money but seem less needed now. HR defenders respond that their work is unseen when done well. They warn that without HR, companies face big legal and cultural risks. They also say HR often delivers tough news from executives but does not create tough decisions. This clash reflects a deeper struggle over power, trust, and control at work. Employees feel disposable; executives press for efficiency; HR mediates the conflict. The debate shows HR must prove its value or face cuts. New models with smaller, focused HR teams may emerge. Amanda Goodall’s challenge, “change my mind,” sums up this moment. HR's future depends on balancing business needs with fair treatment of workers in a world shaped by layoffs and AI.